前几天趁着 RFCHOST 的 CN2 GIA VPS 补货，买了一台最便宜的方案，体验一下，我倒要看看 RFCHOST CN2 GIA 到底有没有宣传中的那么好。今天拿出来测评一下，不过并没有实际使用，过几天考虑挂一个演示站看看。这几天 RFCHOST 的 CN2 GIA 频繁补货，如果有需要的可以选购。
RFCHOST 的其他测评可以参考：
文章目录
隐藏
一、相关方案
512MB VPS LAX2 NA Rev3
- CPU：1 核
- 内存：512 MB
- 硬盘：10 GB HDD
- 端口：500 Mbps
- 流量：500 GB
- 价格：$8.99/月
- 购买：购买链接
1024MB VPS LAX2 NA Rev3
- CPU：1 核
- 内存：1024 MB
- 硬盘：15 GB HDD
- 端口：500 Mbps
- 流量：1000 GB
- 价格：$16.99/月
- 购买：购买链接
更多方案：https://my.rfchost.com/cart.php?gid=14
二、基本信息
bench.sh：
superbench.sh：
三、回程信息
从回程信息可以看出，三网均走 CN2 GIA 到大陆出口，上海电信的延迟更是低至 129 ms，非常美丽了。
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 广州电信 traceroute to 14.215.116.1 (14.215.116.1), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 10.100.0.1 10.63 ms * LAN Address 2 10.8.0.9 2.20 ms * LAN Address 3 118.184.22.61 31.66 ms * China 51idc.com 4 59.43.182.106 160.64 ms * China Guangdong Guangzhou ChinaTelecom 5 * 6 59.43.130.149 184.32 ms * China Guangdong Guangzhou ChinaTelecom 7 59.43.80.122 163.74 ms * China Guangdong Guangzhou ChinaTelecom 8 183.59.12.225 162.59 ms AS58543 China Guangdong Guangzhou ChinaTelecom 9 183.56.129.2 163.59 ms AS58543 China Guangdong Guangzhou ChinaTelecom 10 14.215.116.1 165.34 ms AS58543 China Guangdong Guangzhou ChinaTelecom ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 上海电信 traceroute to 101.95.120.109 (101.95.120.109), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 10.100.0.1 0.23 ms http: error LAN Address 2 10.8.0.9 1.47 ms * LAN Address 3 118.184.22.61 40.14 ms * China 51idc.com 4 59.43.189.37 127.36 ms * China ChinaTelecom 5 59.43.187.65 127.92 ms * China Shanghai ChinaTelecom 6 59.43.138.45 134.89 ms * China Shanghai ChinaTelecom 7 59.43.77.142 131.39 ms * China Shanghai ChinaTelecom 8 101.95.120.109 129.17 ms AS4812 China Shanghai ChinaTelecom ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 厦门电信 traceroute to 117.28.254.129 (117.28.254.129), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 10.100.0.1 0.28 ms * LAN Address 2 10.8.0.9 2.23 ms * LAN Address 3 118.184.22.61 39.25 ms * China 51idc.com 4 59.43.182.106 160.59 ms * China Guangdong Guangzhou ChinaTelecom 5 59.43.187.145 159.84 ms * China Guangdong Guangzhou ChinaTelecom 6 59.43.130.161 218.00 ms * China Guangdong Guangzhou ChinaTelecom 7 59.43.143.2 170.87 ms * China ChinaTelecom 8 27.159.81.246 165.90 ms AS133775 China Fujian Xiamen ChinaTelecom 9 * 10 117.25.141.106 170.01 ms AS133775 China Fujian Xiamen ChinaTelecom 11 * 12 117.28.254.129 173.99 ms AS133775 China Fujian Xiamen ChinaTelecom ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 重庆联通 traceroute to 113.207.32.65 (113.207.32.65), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 10.100.0.1 0.25 ms * LAN Address 2 10.8.0.9 1.09 ms * LAN Address 3 118.184.22.61 1.27 ms http: error China 51idc.com 4 59.43.182.106 160.65 ms * China Guangdong Guangzhou ChinaTelecom 5 59.43.187.157 162.96 ms http: error China Guangdong Guangzhou ChinaTelecom 6 59.43.130.157 162.68 ms * China Guangdong Guangzhou ChinaTelecom 7 59.43.17.173 175.41 ms http: error http: error 8 219.158.40.165 191.05 ms AS4837 China Beijing ChinaUnicom 9 219.158.5.129 204.03 ms AS4837 China Beijing ChinaUnicom 10 219.158.12.70 212.26 ms AS4837 China Chongqing ChinaUnicom 11 113.207.25.114 208.02 ms AS4837 China Chongqing ChinaUnicom ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 四川联通 traceroute to 119.6.6.6 (119.6.6.6), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 10.100.0.1 0.29 ms http: error LAN Address 2 10.8.0.9 15.33 ms * LAN Address 3 118.184.22.61 1.39 ms * China 51idc.com 4 59.43.182.102 144.60 ms * China Guangdong Guangzhou ChinaTelecom 5 * 6 59.43.130.161 154.84 ms * China Guangdong Guangzhou ChinaTelecom 7 59.43.17.173 167.63 ms http: error http: error 8 219.158.40.165 182.71 ms AS4837 China Beijing ChinaUnicom 9 219.158.3.65 194.61 ms AS4837 China Beijing ChinaUnicom 10 219.158.110.202 200.40 ms http: error China Sichuan Chengdu ChinaUnicom 11 119.6.197.198 208.42 ms http: error China Sichuan Chengdu ChinaUnicom 12 119.7.220.218 202.08 ms AS4837 China Sichuan Chengdu ChinaUnicom 13 119.6.6.6 195.92 ms http: error http: error ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 上海移动 traceroute to 183.192.160.3 (183.192.160.3), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 10.100.0.1 0.26 ms * LAN Address 2 10.8.0.9 1.18 ms * LAN Address 3 118.184.22.61 1.24 ms * China 51idc.com 4 59.43.189.37 127.39 ms * China ChinaTelecom 5 59.43.186.249 128.98 ms * China Shanghai ChinaTelecom 6 59.43.130.201 135.07 ms * China Shanghai ChinaTelecom 7 59.43.80.106 134.44 ms * China Shanghai ChinaTelecom 8 202.97.46.70 129.62 ms AS4134 China Shanghai ChinaTelecom 9 221.183.15.25 154.83 ms AS9808 China Shanghai ChinaMobile 10 221.176.22.37 199.54 ms AS9808 China Shanghai ChinaMobile 11 221.183.13.158 178.79 ms AS9808 China Shanghai ChinaMobile 12 117.185.10.130 161.86 ms AS9808 China Shanghai ChinaMobile 13 120.204.194.14 157.84 ms AS9808 China Shanghai ChinaMobile 14 183.192.160.3 161.79 ms AS9808 China Shanghai ChinaMobile ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 成都移动 traceroute to 183.221.253.100 (183.221.253.100), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 10.100.0.1 0.31 ms * LAN Address 2 10.8.0.9 1.21 ms * LAN Address 3 118.184.22.61 1.31 ms * China 51idc.com 4 59.43.182.106 160.52 ms * China Guangdong Guangzhou ChinaTelecom 5 * 6 59.43.130.121 162.46 ms * China Guangdong Guangzhou ChinaTelecom 7 59.43.80.118 157.49 ms * China Guangdong Guangzhou ChinaTelecom 8 202.97.36.226 181.41 ms AS4134 China Sichuan Chengdu ChinaTelecom 9 * 10 221.183.15.165 197.31 ms AS9808 China Sichuan Chengdu ChinaMobile 11 221.176.20.149 199.51 ms AS9808 China Sichuan Chengdu ChinaMobile 12 221.183.19.42 204.26 ms AS9808 China Sichuan Chengdu ChinaMobile 13 183.221.32.30 198.54 ms AS9808 China Sichuan Chengdu ChinaMobile 14 223.87.85.62 205.44 ms AS9808 China Sichuan Chengdu ChinaMobile 15 183.221.253.100 195.10 ms AS9808 China Sichuan Chengdu ChinaMobile ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 成都教育网 traceroute to 202.112.14.151 (202.112.14.151), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 10.100.0.1 0.32 ms * LAN Address 2 10.8.0.9 5.52 ms * LAN Address 3 118.184.22.61 1.22 ms * China 51idc.com 4 59.43.248.130 9.20 ms * United States California San Jose ChinaTelecom 5 59.43.182.182 161.68 ms * China Shanghai ChinaTelecom 6 59.43.247.61 128.36 ms * China Shanghai ChinaTelecom 7 59.43.138.57 128.71 ms * China Shanghai ChinaTelecom 8 59.43.80.106 133.65 ms http: error China Shanghai ChinaTelecom 9 202.97.46.14 128.60 ms AS4134 China Shanghai ChinaTelecom 10 * 11 101.4.114.249 159.66 ms AS4538 China Shanghai CHINAEDU 12 101.4.112.41 164.03 ms AS4538 China Jiangsu Nanjing CHINAEDU 13 101.4.117.25 202.09 ms AS4538 China Anhui Hefei CHINAEDU 14 101.4.112.61 179.33 ms AS4538 China Hubei Wuhan CHINAEDU 15 101.4.112.29 197.11 ms AS4538 China Chongqing CHINAEDU 16 101.4.117.53 218.27 ms AS4538 China CHINAEDU 17 101.4.115.222 193.95 ms AS4538 China Sichuan Chengdu CHINAEDU 18 202.115.255.250 201.53 ms AS4538 China Sichuan Chengdu CHINAEDU 19 202.115.254.246 194.37 ms http: error China Sichuan Chengdu CHINAEDU 20 * 21 dns.uestc.edu.cn (202.112.14.151) 194.29 ms AS4538 China Sichuan Chengdu CHINAEDU ----------------------------------------------------------------------
四、UnixBench 跑分
UnixBench 跑分在 1200 多分，性能也算是非常强悍了，值得购买。
========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
System: RFCHOST-190111-XQIJ: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux -- 4.10.0-28-generic -- #32~16.04.2-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jul 20 10:19:48 UTC 2017
Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz (4000.0 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
04:54:33 up 2 days, 3:33, 1 user, load average: 0.38, 0.12, 0.08; runlevel 5
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sun Jan 13 2019 04:54:33 - 05:22:26
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 25073105.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 1837.0 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 3580.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 843038.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 237717.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1769202.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1517072.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 249250.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 9261.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 6622.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 850.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 3019033.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 25073105.9 2148.5
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 1837.0 334.0
Execl Throughput 43.0 3580.5 832.7
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 843038.2 2128.9
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 237717.0 1436.4
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1769202.8 3050.3
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1517072.9 1219.5
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 249250.1 623.1
Process Creation 126.0 9261.0 735.0
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6622.0 1561.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 850.5 1417.4
System Call Overhead 15000.0 3019033.3 2012.7
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1245.0